MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411253407 · doi:10.3389/fcvm.2025.1568920

Characteristics and risk profile of the over fifty adult congenital heart surgical population, a retrospective cohort

2025· article· en· W4411253407 on OpenAlexaff
Matthanja Bieze, Olivia V. Poole, Arshia Delfani, Jane Heggie, Marcus Salvatori

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsCapital District Health AuthorityAtlantic School of TheologyToronto General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRetrospective cohort studyCohortInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction The surgical and medical management of aging patients with adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) continues to innovate to meet the evolving needs of this unique patient population, leading to improved life expectancy and quality of life. However, the ACHD population is characterized by high morbidity and mortality. With this study, we aim to describe patient characteristics and surgical outcomes for the over fifty ACHD cardiac surgical cohort, focusing on risk factors for mortality and major complications. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study including ACHD patients undergoing surgical repair from January 2004 to March 2023. Primary outcome was the composite of severe postoperative complications and secondary outcomes were 1-year mortality, ICU stay and hospital length of stay. Descriptive statistics,univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used. Results In the study period, 1381 patients with ACHD underwent cardiac surgery, of which 292 (20.5%) were over 50 years. In the overall group, the most common primary surgery was pulmonary valve replacement in 411 (29.8%), in the over 50 group this was ASD and VSD repairs in 102 (34.9%). The composite of major postoperative complications was different between the overall group and the over 50 years group (10.7% vs. 13.7%; P = 0.049), which in the over 50 group was associated with CPB time (180 min vs. 104 min, OR 1.01; 95%CI 1.00–1.03), and preoperative creatinine levels (84 vs. 77, OR 1.01; 95%CI 1.00–1.03). No difference was seen in 1-year mortality (P = 0.415). Conclusion With careful patient selection and preoperative optimization, surgical risks remain low, even in aging ACHD patients. Although overall mortality rates are low, postoperative complications increase, and patients over 50 with DM, renal failure, long pump runs or postoperative stroke are at highest risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationallow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationallow
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Cardiovascular MedicineSame topicCongenital Heart Disease StudiesFrench-language works237,207