MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract P2-08-26: FLEX: A Real-World Evidence, Full Transcriptome Study in 30,000 Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer

2025· article· en· W4411255039 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robert Maganini, Ellis Levine, Kent Hoskins, Sarah Thayer, Alfredo A. Santillan, Sung Ho-Lee, Eduardo Dias, Regina Hampton, Eric Brown, Maxwell Brown, Joyce O' Shaughnessy, Nicole Stivers, Harshini Ramaswamy, Katie Quinn, Isha Kapoor, William Audeh

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFLEXCancerMedicineTranscriptomeBreast cancerStage (stratigraphy)OncologyInternal medicineBiologyGeneGeneticsComputer scienceGene expressionTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: The advent of subtype-specific treatments, particularly hormone therapies and HER2-targeted therapies, has significantly improved survival rates and quality of life for breast cancer (BC) patients. Over the last decade genomic signatures have enabled improved classification of BC into distinct molecular subtypes, providing prognostic and/or predictive information about the metastatic potential of the tumor beyond those of clinicopathologic features. Despite marked progress, BC remains the most frequent cause of cancer death among women globally, accounting for almost 15.5% of all new female BC cases in the US. These poor clinical outcomes warrant further understanding of tumor heterogeneity and identifying genomic signatures, particularly variation within the subset of ER positive early-stage breast cancer (EBC). Pairing the full genome expression data with comprehensive clinical information enables further tumor stratification and a deeper understanding of tumor biology driving EBC. The ongoing, multi-center FLEX study (NCT03053193) seeks to enroll 30,000 patients to create a large-scale, diverse, population-based registry of full genome expression data matched with clinical data to investigate new gene expression signatures of prognostic and/or predictive value in a real-world setting. Efforts are focused on increasing clinical trial enrollment of racial/ethnic minorities and other historically underrepresented groups in clinical trials in the US to promote efficacy in outcomes and health equity. Additional objectives include supporting investigator-initiated sub-studies to address yet unresolved clinically relevant questions in EBC over 5-10 years of follow-up. Methods: FLEX is a large, multi-center, prospective, observational trial that enrolls patients (male or female) who are ≥ 18 years old with histologically proven stage I-III breast cancer. All patients with up to 3 positive lymph nodes who receive standard of care MammaPrint (70-gene signature risk of recurrence), with or without BluePrint (80-gene signature molecular subtype) on a primary breast tumor and consent to clinically annotated full transcriptome data collection are eligible for enrollment. FLEX fosters collaboration across 95 sites in the US, 2 sites in Canada, 1 site in Greece, and Israel. This initiative encourages investigator-initiated sub-studies, promoting diverse research perspectives and potentially enhancing the scope and robustness of the overall study. Within 7 years of trial initiation, FLEX total enrollment amounts to 16,980 EBC patients. To address racial/ ethnic disparities in clinical trials, a concerted effort has led to the inclusion of 1,377 Black, 530 Latin American (LA)/Hispanic, 353 AAPI, out of 14,330 EBC patients with self-reported race and ethnicity, making FLEX the most diverse study on EBC patients to date. Such diversity in FLEX sets a valuable precedent for future research aiming to improve healthcare outcomes for all groups. Currently FLEX supports 12 in-progress investigator initiated sub-studies in 2024, with over 45 abstracts accepted at congresses internationally (2018-2024), including 11 presentations and 2 poster spot-light sessions that address the underlying differences in tumor biology and clinical outcomes in Black, LA, and AAPI populations. Overall, as FLEX continues to grow, the study strives to leverage full transcriptome data to enhance precision medicine in EBC. By identifying molecular subtypes and predictive biomarkers, the trial intends to equip clinicians with enhanced tools for tailoring treatment strategies more effectively in EBC. The FLEX trial represents a pioneering effort in integrating genomic data and clinical information on a large scale to improve outcomes and reduce disparities in EBC. Its emphasis on diversity, comprehensive data collection, and collaborative research pursuits places it at the forefront of precision medicine in EBC. Citation Format: Robert Maganini, Ellis Levine, Kent Hoskins, Sarah Thayer, Alfredo Santillan, Sung Ho-Lee, Eduardo Dias, Regina Hampton, Eric Brown, Maxwell Brown, Joyce O' Shaughnessy, Nicole Stivers, Harshini Ramaswamy, Katie Quinn, Isha Kapoor, William Audeh. FLEX: A Real-World Evidence, Full Transcriptome Study in 30,000 Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2024; 2024 Dec 10-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(12 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-08-26.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.167
GPT teacher head0.525
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer ResearchSame topicAdvanced Breast Cancer TherapiesFrench-language works237,207