MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411256828 · doi:10.1083/jcb.202409078

Arc controls organ architecture through modulation of Crb and MyoII

2025· article· en· W4411256828 on OpenAlexaff
Ji Hoon Kim, Rika Maruyama, Kwon Kim, Devin A. Vertrees, Parama Paul, Kyla A. Britson, Nathaniel Laughner, Deborah J. Andrew

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Cell Biology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial ResearchNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsInternalizationLimitingLumen (anatomy)MyosinPDZ domainCell biologyArc (geometry)BiophysicsChemistryBiologyAnatomyBiochemistryReceptorGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Precise orchestration of morphogenetic processes generates organs that are optimally positioned and the right size and shape to fit and maximize functionality. Here, we show that Arc, a large apical membrane-associated PDZ domain-containing protein, works through the apical determinant Crumbs to limit non-muscle myosin II (MyoII) activity during tissue invagination in the Drosophila salivary gland (SG). We show that loss of Arc, attenuation of Crumbs, and increased activation of MyoII leads to the simultaneous internalization of more precursor cells than normal. Consequently, mature SGs are shorter with more cells surrounding the lumen all along the tube. Correspondingly, overexpression of Arc or SG-specific knockdown of MyoII leads to longer SGs with fewer cells surrounding the lumen. Our findings support a model wherein plasma membrane (PM)-associated Crumbs stabilizes cellular junctions by limiting apical pools of activated MyoII and countering the destabilizing effects of MyoII at the PM, limiting how many cells internalize at any given time, shaping final tube geometry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Cell BiologySame topicHippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZFrench-language works237,207