Triple therapy vs dual inhaler therapy for moderate-to-severe asthma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Long-acting muscarinic antagonists are typically added to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting β-agonists (LABA) for asthma management. OBJECTIVE: To systematically synthesize the benefits and harms of triple therapy (ICS/LABA/long-acting muscarinic antagonists) compared with dual therapy (ICS/LABA) for asthma management across key subpopulations as part of developing linked American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology/American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology guidelines. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from January 1, 2020 to February 1, 2025, for randomized trials comparing inhaled triple therapy to dual therapy for asthma to update our previous systematic review. Paired reviewers independently screened citations, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. Random effects meta-analyses assessed asthma control (asthma control questionnaire-7; 0-6), asthma-related quality of life (asthma quality of life questionnaire; 1-7), prebronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second, severe exacerbations, and serious adverse events. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach informed the certainty of evidence. Open Science Framework Registration (https://osf.io/u8t4q/). RESULTS: A total of 26 trials randomized 12,431 participants. Compared with dual therapy, triple therapy reduces severe exacerbations in patients at high risk for future exacerbation (relative risk 0.83, 95% CI 0.76-0.90; risk difference 5.3% fewer; high certainty), with trivial improvement in asthma control (mean difference [MD] -0.04, 95% CI -0.07 to 0.00, moderate certainty; lower better), quality of life (MD 0.05, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.14, moderate certainty; higher better), and prebronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (MD 0.07, 95% CI 0.05-0.09; high certainty), without increase in serious adverse events (moderate certainty). The effects were consistent across age, body mass index, and exacerbation history. CONCLUSION: In patients with moderate-to-severe asthma, triple therapy, compared with dual therapy, reduces severe exacerbations in patients at high risk for future exacerbation with minimal harm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".