Frequency-Selective Grounding for Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Frequency Drives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Variable frequency drives (VFDs), including permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) VFDs, have to be grounded in order to improve their operation and protection. In PMSM-VFDs, an adequate grounding can help in reducing common-mode voltages (CMVs), improving personnel safety, and limiting ground fault currents. Several standards and industrial codes have addressed the adequate grounding systems for VFDs, including PMSM-VFDs. This paper presents the design and performance assessment of the new frequency-selective grounding (FSG), when utilized in a PMSM-VFD. The design of the FSG is based on a parallel$R-C$circuit, which behaves as a very low impedance for high frequency voltages and a low-resistance for low frequency voltages. Such functions of the FSG can significantly reduce common-mode voltages (CMVs) in PMSMVFDs, thus minimizing their adverse impacts on the drive and its components. The performance of the proposed FSG in PMSMVFDs is experimentally tested using a$5 h p, 3 \phi$PMSM-VFD for different operating conditions. Experimental test results discussed and presented in this paper demonstrate the significant reductions in CMVs, along with negligible sensitivity to the operating speed and/or loading level of the PMSM-VFD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".