MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411272591 · doi:10.1093/crocol/otaf043

Fecal Calprotectin and C-Reactive Protein Association With Histologic and Endoscopic Endpoints in Mirikizumab-Treated Patients With Ulcerative Colitis

2025· article· en· W4411272591 on OpenAlex
Remo Panaccione, Faye Chan-Diehl, Simin Baygani, Deborah A. Fisher, Richard Moses, Britta Siegmund, Alissa Walsh, Taku Kobayashi, Parambir S. Dulai, Simon Travis

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCrohn s & Colitis 360 · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersEli Lilly and Company
KeywordsCalprotectinUlcerative colitisGastroenterologyFecesMedicineInternal medicineC-reactive proteinColitisInflammatory bowel diseaseInflammationBiologyDiseaseMicrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Fecal calprotectin (FC) and C-reactive protein (CRP) are noninvasive biomarkers used in ulcerative colitis (UC) clinical trials; however, thresholds defined as "normal" in trials may be higher than "normal" thresholds typically used in clinical practice. We assessed the relationship between FC and CRP improvement in the "normal" range across different cutoff thresholds for patients with moderately to severely active UC treated with mirikizumab. Methods: Patients achieving clinical response to mirikizumab in LUCENT-1 (Weeks 0-12) proceeded to LUCENT-2 (Weeks 12-52 [52 weeks of continuous mirikizumab]). Associations between FC and CRP levels at multiple thresholds and histologic-endoscopic mucosal improvement (HEMI) and histologic-endoscopic mucosal remission (HEMR) at Weeks 12 and 52 were assessed by Fisher's exact test. Least squares means of FC and CRP changes from baseline at Weeks 12 and 52 were calculated using analysis of covariance with HEMI or HEMR status as factors and baseline FC or CRP values as covariates. Results: At Weeks 12 and 52, greater proportions of patients with FC thresholds of ≤250, ≤150, ≤100, and ≤50 µg/g, and CRP thresholds of ≤6 and ≤5 mg/L, achieved HEMI and HEMR compared with those not achieving HEMI and HEMR. Changes from baseline in FC and CRP at Week 12 and FC at Week 52 were greater in patients who achieved HEMI and HEMR compared with those not achieving these endpoints. Conclusions: These results show that FC and CRP analyses may contribute to a noninvasive monitoring strategy in clinical practice.ClinicalTrials.gov numbers: NCT03518086, NCT03524092.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.798

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it