MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411277366 · doi:10.1080/01433768.2025.2503535

The impact of watermills on the landscape of the River Great Ouse valley between Brampton and Hemingford Grey, 1086–1350: the identification and analysis of the extensive adaptation and construction of river channels that were engineered to power a series of valuable watermills

2025· article· en· W4411277366 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bridget Flanagan, Keith Grimwade

Bibliographic record

VenueLandscape History · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHistorical Economic and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentification (biology)Adaptation (eye)GeographyHydrology (agriculture)GeologyEcologyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study identifies how the growth and development of a series of watermills — recorded as the most valuable in England in the Domesday Survey — significantly changed the landscape of a stretch of the River Great Ouse valley in the three centuries between the Norman Conquest (1066) and the Black Death (c 1350). By utilising remote sensing (LiDAR), cartographic analysis and fieldwork, combined with analysis of documentary (especially contemporary litigation) and literary sources, we demonstrate that landscape features that, hitherto, have either been ignored or attributed to natural processes are, in fact, the result of milling activity. The study’s findings describe and explain the national pre-eminence of water milling in Huntingdonshire in the eleventh century and show how activity expanded in the post-Conquest period. The examination helps rationalise other features of the historical landscape, such as parish boundaries. The case study presented here has broader implications for the understanding of the development of multi-channel river forms, to which end we conclude by advocating a mapping methodology that designates landscape features resulting from water milling as heritage assets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score0.253

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLandscape HistorySame topicHistorical Economic and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207