Age and life stage in the experience of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a scoping review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: Understanding the experiences of people living with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (plwALS) is necessary to appreciate their unique needs. Age and stage in the life course influence how illness is experienced; however, the extent to which age-specific complexities of living with ALS have been examined remains unexplored. This review aims to map the available evidence exploring age, age-graded role, or life-course transition with regards to the experience of ALS and to identify age-specific gaps in the literature. Methods: A scoping review guided by Joanna Briggs Institute methodology was undertaken. Eligible articles included peer-reviewed primary research studies, published in English from 2010 onward, investigating illness experience of adults with ALS with consideration for how age, age-graded roles, or life-course transitions influenced experience. Database sources included: Ovid’s Medline, Embase, and PsycINFO; EBSCO CINAHL; and ProQuest Sociological Abstracts. Findings related to ALS experience and dimensions of age were summarized descriptively and categorized using qualitative content analysis. Results: Six thousand one hundred and eighty individual records were identified and screened. Forty-five articles, reporting 42 studies, were included. Findings regarding thoughts, feelings, or emotions of plwALS were most common and varied depending on whether they were in reference to chronological age or age-graded role. Despite the importance of life-course transitions for illness experience, they were not routinely considered. Conclusion: Numerous aspects of the experience of plwALS have been reported in reference to age; however, the significance of age-graded roles and life-course transitions warrants further examination. Recognition of age-related complexities of living with ALS will facilitate more personalized ALS care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".