MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411289134 · doi:10.2337/db25-626-p

626-P: Diab@ease—A Pilot Study on Holistic Mental Health Integration for Diabetes, Cognitive Function, and Physical Frailty

2025· article· en· W4411289134 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Chandni Radhakrishnan, Sudha Kumari P

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitionMental healthDiabetes mellitusPsychologyGerontologyMedicinePsychotherapistPsychiatryEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction and Objective: Diabetes is a chronic condition closely linked to cognitive decline, physical frailty, and mental health issues. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility and preliminary outcomes of a multidisciplinary, patient-centered intervention, providing insights for scaling to a larger study. Methods: Enrolled 53 subjects with type 2 diabetes, aged ≥ 60 years, with duration > 5 years. Each subject was provided with personalized dietary interventions focused on low-glycemic, nutrient-dense foods, tailored physical activity programs and mindfulness-based stress reduction techniques. Baseline assessments included Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE], Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA]), frailty evaluation (Fried Frailty Index), mental health assessments (PHQ-9, GAD-7) and HbA1c and repeated after 6 months. Feasibility metrics included retention, adherence, and implementation challenges. Results: Of the 53 enrolled, 39 participants (74%) completed the study. Attrition included 9 losses (17%) due to age-related complications and 5 withdrawals (9%) due to mobility constraints, underscoring the need for adaptive strategies in geriatric populations. Cognitive scores improved significantly (MMSE: +2.5, 95% CI: 1.1-3.9; MoCA: +3.1, 95% CI: 2.0-4.2), Frailty scores showed marked reductions (Fried Frailty Index: -1.2, 95% CI: -1.7 to -0.7), Depression (PHQ-9: -4.3, 95% CI: -5.6 to -3.0) and anxiety (GAD-7: -3.7, 95% CI: -4.9 to -2.5) symptoms improved significantly, Glycemic control also improved (HbA1c: -0.7%, 95% CI: -1.1% to -0.3%). Conclusion: This pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of integrating cognitive, physical, and mental health interventions into diabetes care, yielding promising preliminary outcomes. The Diab@ease pilot study underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in diabetes care. Disclosure S. Shaji: None. C. Radhakrishnan: None. S.S. K p: None.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: Non-randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.322
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.119 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetesSame topicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207