MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411293239 · doi:10.2337/db25-229-or

229-OR: The Accuracy of a Novel Continuous Ketone Monitoring System (CKM) and Metrics of Ketosis during Ketogenic Diets in Type 1 Diabetes (T1D)

2025· article· en· W4411293239 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
NICHOLAS SABELLI, AHMAD HAIDAR, Dorsa Majdpour, Melissa‐Rosina Pasqua, MICHAEL TSOUKAS, NOAH PERZ, Samantha Jacobson

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet and metabolism studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKetosisKetogenic dietMedicineKetone bodiesKetogenesisType 2 diabetesEndocrinologyDiabetes mellitusPediatricsEpilepsyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction and Objective: We evaluated i) the accuracy of SiBio CKM and ii) continuous ketone levels during two ketogenic diets, in individuals with T1D on automated insulin delivery (AID). Methods: We compared the readings of the CKM on day 7 of wear age to capillary measurements by FreeStyle Libre 2 ketone meter in adults who underwent 8-hour inpatient insulin suspension experiments. We also assessed metrics of continuous ketone levels using the CKM on two 6-day ketogenic diets: very-low carbohydrate diet (<50 g/day) and intermittent 12-hour fasting in outpatient free-living settings. Results: During insulin suspensions, 181 paired data points were collected from 14 adults (10 female, mean age of 36.5 y, HbA1c 6.9%, insulin dose 0.72 units/kg). The overall mean absolute difference (MAD) between the CKM and capillary readings was 0.2 mmol/L and the relative MAD for ketone values ≥0.6 and ≥1.0 mmol/L were 24% and 20%, respectively. During the ketogenic diets, the percent time with CKM values <0.6 and ≥0.6 mmol/L were 97.9% and 2.1% (30 min/day), respectively. The number of continuous ketosis events >0.6 and >1.0 mmol/L of more than 30 minutes were 51 and 7 events (i.e., 1 event in 2.7 and 20 days), respectively, with an average duration of 77 min/event; all events were asymptomatic. Conclusion: SiBio CKM demonstrated acceptable accuracy and reveals that benign, transient ketosis may be common in T1D. Disclosure N. Sabelli: None. A. Haidar: Research Support; Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. Consultant; Eli Lilly and Company, Abbott. Research Support; ADOCIA, Dexcom, Inc., Ypsomed AG, Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc. D. Majdpour: None. M. Pasqua: Speaker's Bureau; Abbott, Sanofi, Medtronic. M. Tsoukas: Speaker's Bureau; Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly and Company, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Sanofi. N. Perz: None. S. Jacobson: None. Funding Diabetes Quebec (Subvention de m?rite)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetesSame topicDiet and metabolism studiesFrench-language works237,207