MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411294548 · doi:10.2196/75942

The Impact of Social Stress and Healthy Lifestyle on the Mortality of Chinese Older Adults: Prospective Cohort Study

2025· article· en· W4411294548 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Qingmei Huang, Jian Gao, Zhihao Li, Yuebin Lv, Xiaoming Shi, Chen Mao

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Aging · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHealth disparities and outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreprintGerontologyCohort studyProspective cohort studyMedicineCohortPsychologyStress (linguistics)Internal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: With social progress, social stress (SS) has become a key factor affecting health. Unhealthy lifestyles may exacerbate these effects. However, the relationship between SS, lifestyle, and older adults' mortality rate still needs to be studied. Objective: This study aimed to explore the relationship between SS and all-cause mortality in Chinese older adults, as well as the influence of healthy lifestyle factors. Methods: Three groups of SS were defined through latent class analysis: low, medium, and high. We created a healthy lifestyle index based on smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, and diet. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, interaction analyses, and mediation analyses were conducted. Results: The Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS) datasets included participants from 806 cities and counties across 23 provinces in China from 1998 to 2018. In this study, participants were recruited from 4 waves of the CLHLS (2005, 2008, 2011, and 2014). Finally, 19,236 participants were included in this study, of which 6891 (35.8%) had low SS, 11,662 (60.6%) had medium SS, and 683 (3.6%) had high SS. In the fully adjusted model, the hazard ratio (HR) for medium SS was 1.16 (95% CI 1.11-1.20; P<.001), and for high SS, it was 1.28 (95% CI 1.18-1.40; P<.001) compared to the low SS group. For individuals aged ≥80 years, the medium SS group had a 28% (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.22-1.34; P<.001) increased mortality risk, and the high SS group had a 38% (HR 1.38, 95%CI 1.26-1.52; P<.001) increased risk compared to the low SS group. Approximately 7% of the association between SS and mortality was mediated through the healthy lifestyle. Under different SS, the lower the healthy lifestyle score, the higher the risk of mortality. Conclusions: SS was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in Chinese older adults. The healthy lifestyle mediated this effect to some extent. Unhealthy lifestyle behaviors were associated with a higher risk of mortality at all SS levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.978

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.395 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR AgingSame topicHealth disparities and outcomesFrench-language works237,207