An Empirical Study on Resident Engagement in Service Innovation for Wellness Tourism Sustainable Development: An Analysis Based on SEM and fsQCA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As wellness tourism destinations face increasing competitive pressures and environmental challenges, there is a heightened emphasis on implementing innovative service strategies that promote community engagement and sustainable development. The study proposes an integrated model grounded in generativity and service innovation theory to investigate the factors influencing resident engagement in service innovation performance (SIP). Four hundred-eight valid responses are using a snowball sampling technique. This research employed structural equation modeling (SEM) to assess the impact of individual variables, complemented by fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to explore the synergistic effects of multiple variables. The SEM results indicate that place attachment, generativity, and digital technology significantly enhance resident engagement in SIP, whereas knowledge management does not exhibit a statistically significant effect. Furthermore, fsQCA identifies three configurations linked to high-quality SIP and two configurations associated with low-quality SIP. The complementary insights gained from SEM and fsQCA enhance theoretical frameworks and provide practical implications for stakeholders in the tourism sector.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".