MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411312063 · doi:10.53762/rnsy9631

10.53762/rnsy9631

2000· article· en· W4411312063 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInnovative Teaching Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)Subject (documents)Mathematics educationMedical educationEngineeringComputer sciencePsychologyMedicineLibrary scienceMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study looked into descriptive research to evaluate the existing conditions of the science laboratories in the government secondary schools of Hyderabad District. This study is concerned to identify the problems faced by the science teachers and students in teaching and learning of science due to non-functionality of science laboratories in government secondary schools. The study focused on the objectives; to find out the availability of facilities in the laboratories of government secondary schools for science teachers and students, to assess the current competencies of science subjects’ teachers in practical/laboratory work in government secondary schools and to find out the problems faced by science subject teachers in carrying out practical work in laboratories. The population for the research project comprised of science teachers, science students, headmasters and science lab staff of government secondary schools of Hyderabad District. The sample was randomly selected from four talukas (sub-divisions) Data was collected through questionnaire, interviews and observations. Both quantitative and qualitative data analysis approaches were used for data analysis. Main findings of the study were; there existed no good science laboratories in the government secondary schools, laboratories were not fully functional and science practicals seldom conducted, proper funds were not provided for the purchase of apparatus, teachers were not trained to conduct practicals, shortage of technical staff was also observed. science teachers should be trained to conduct science practicals, proper funds should be provided to the schools for purchase of science apparatus, shortage of technical staff should be overcome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score0.342

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9940.969

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it