Exploratory digital outcome measures of motor sign progression in Parkinson’s disease patients treated with prasinezumab
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Digital health technology (DHT) tools for Parkinson's disease (PD) e.g., smartphones and wearables were used for remote and frequent measurement of motor signs in the phase 2 PASADENA study of the anti-alpha-synuclein monoclonal antibody prasinezumab. 316 early-stage PD participants were randomized to placebo, 1500 mg, or 4500 mg prasinezumab for 52 weeks; placebo participants were re-randomized to prasinezumab for the ensuing 52 weeks. Patients performed daily smartphone motor "active tests", and were passively monitored by smartphone/smartwatch throughout the day over 2 y. Change from baseline analyses censored data at dopaminergic treatment start. Bilateral speeded tapping variability and hand-turning, U-turn speed, passively monitored hand movement power, and summary Simple Sum scores progressed numerically less in prasinezumab-treated vs placebo at week 52. All findings except hand-turning persisted at week 104. DHT sensor-based outcome measures may contribute to quantifying disease progression in clinical research of early-stage, dopaminergic treatment-naïve PD. Clinical Trial Registry Name: ClinicalTrials.gov; Clinical Trial Registry ID: NCT03100149; registered 2017-03-29.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".