MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411327847 · doi:10.3390/math13121959

Kernel Ridge-Type Shrinkage Estimators in Partially Linear Regression Models with Correlated Errors

2025· article· en· W4411327847 on OpenAlexaff
S. Ejaz Ahmed, Ersin Yılmaz, Dursun Aydın

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRidgeShrinkageEstimatorKernel (algebra)Linear regressionStatisticsMathematicsRegressionType (biology)Regression analysisLinear modelGeologyCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Partially linear time series models often suffer from multicollinearity among regressors and autocorrelated errors, both of which can inflate estimation risk. This study introduces a generalized ridge-type kernel (GRTK) framework that combines kernel smoothing with ridge shrinkage and augments it through ordinary and positive-part Stein adjustments. Closed-form expressions and large-sample properties are established, and data-driven criteria—including GCV, AICc, BIC, and RECP—are used to tune the bandwidth and shrinkage penalties. Monte-Carlo simulations indicate that the proposed procedures usually reduce risk relative to existing semiparametric alternatives, particularly when the predictors are strongly correlated and the error process is dependent. An empirical study of US airline-delay data further demonstrates that GRTK produces a stable, interpretable fit, captures a nonlinear air-time effect overlooked by conventional approaches, and leaves only a modest residual autocorrelation. By tackling multicollinearity and autocorrelation within a single, flexible estimator, the GRTK family offers practitioners a practical avenue for more reliable inference in partially linear time series settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.470
Threshold uncertainty score0.844

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematicsSame topicStatistical Methods and InferenceFrench-language works237,207