MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411328752 · doi:10.1144/geochem2024-070

Geochemical fingerprinting of a radon anomaly: high-resolution PCA–ANOVA case study, Castleisland, SW Ireland

2025· article· en· W4411328752 on OpenAlexaff
Méabh H. Banríon, Quentin Crowley

Bibliographic record

VenueGeochemistry Exploration Environment Analysis · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicRadioactivity and Radon Measurements
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnomaly (physics)GeologyRadonResolution (logic)GeochemistryMineralogyArtificial intelligenceComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Radon represents a global health risk, and so accurate delineation of radon-prone areas is a prerequisite for evidence-based radon mitigation and public health protection. National probabilistic radon models of Ireland, based on 1:1 M bedrock geological maps that group the Clare Shales with limestones achieve ∼74% accuracy. Despite the high accuracy of Ireland's national radon map, some discrepancies still exist. Using geochemical and geostatistical methods, we investigated a significant and persistent radon anomaly over the Clare Shale Formation at Castleisland, Co. Kerry, Ireland. Fifty-six topsoil samples collected from the A-horizon within a 6 km 2 grid, with samples spaced every 250–500 m apart, were included in the analysis and compared to co-located soil-gas radon measurements. Following centred and isometric log-ratio transformations of inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS)/optical emission spectroscopy (OES) data for 37 elements, soils above the Clare Shales exhibited a median U concentration of 4 mg kg −1 (range 1.4–37 mg kg −1 ). Pearson correlations between log 10 soil-gas radon and individual elements peaked at a Pearson correlation coefficient ( r ) = 0.57 for Sr (coefficient of determination ( R 2 ) = 0.32), with similarly strong associations for V ( r = 0.54), Ag ( r = 0.52), P ( r = 0.47), Au ( r = 0.46), U ( r = 0.45) and Tl ( r = 0.43) (all P < 0.001). One-way ANOVA indicates radon class categories explain a median 43.8% of variance in 14 trace elements, while bedrock geology explains 27.8%. Shared tracers (U, V, P, Ag, Sb) underscore overlapping lithological and radiogenic controls. Principal components 1–3 (PC1–PC3) capture 62.9% of total variance (PC1 = 31.8%, PC2 = 17.2%, PC3 = 13.9%). PC1 is defined by strong positive loadings on Sc, Mg, Fe, Al, Th, Ni and Co, and negative loadings on Sr, Ag, U, P and V, neatly contrasting shale-derived, high-radon soils from carbonate terrains. This study demonstrates that local-scale lithogeochemical proxies, resolved at 250 m and calibrated against a 1:100 k geological framework, can effectively delineate elevated radon sources. This approach offers a systematic means to investigate map anomalies, refine national radon models, enhance spatial accuracy, and support evidence-based radon risk assessment and public health protection initiatives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.235
Threshold uncertainty score0.467

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeochemistry Exploration Environment AnalysisSame topicRadioactivity and Radon MeasurementsFrench-language works237,207