MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411335038 · doi:10.1101/2025.06.13.659495

Paralog interference preserves genetic redundancy

2025· preprint· en· W4411335038 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEvolutionary Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalPROTEO
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRedundancy (engineering)Interference (communication)Computer scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Models of gene duplication often assume that loss-of-function mutations neutrally promote the return to the ancestral singleton state. They thus ignore the potential functional interference between duplicated proteins stemming from their physical interactions. Here, we show that for heteromerizing paralogs, such interference potentiates negative selection on loss-of-function mutations. This effect maintains genetic redundancy over longer timescales depending on the rate and severity of loss-of-function mutations. We experimentally estimate that around 6% of deleterious substitutions for a representative tetrameric protein interfere with a second copy. Interfering mutations typically disrupt either catalysis or the final step of protein complex assembly, with varying degrees of severity. Our work shows that paralog interference potentiates the negative effects of loss-of-function mutations, contributing to the preservation of genetic redundancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.720
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it