CAML: Commutative Algebra Machine Learning─A Case Study on Protein–Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, Suwayyid and Wei introduced commutative algebra as an emerging paradigm for machine learning and data science. In this work, we propose commutative algebra machine learning (CAML) for the prediction of protein-ligand binding affinities. Specifically, we apply persistent Stanley-Reisner theory, a key concept in combinatorial commutative algebra, to the affinity predictions of protein-ligand binding and metalloprotein-ligand binding. We present three new algorithms, i.e., element-specific commutative algebra, category-specific commutative algebra, and commutative algebra on bipartite complexes, to tackle the complexity of data involved in (metallo) protein-ligand complexes. We show that the proposed CAML outperforms other state-of-the-art methods in (metallo) protein-ligand binding affinity predictions, indicating the great potential of commutative algebra learning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".