Bibliographic record
Abstract
Man alone, among all creations, is bestowed with the quality of communication and conversation. Through the medium of communication, the personality, knowledge, competency and thinking level of a speaker can be explored. In the case of low communication skills, it remains impossible to change public opinion and appeal their attention towards a specific idea. All prophets of Allah Almighty were bestowed with the quality of magniloquent communication and eloquent speech. The last prophet Muhammad (P.B.U.H) was chosen among the persons who consider themselves most eloquent persons. They feel proud of their poets and orators. In this scenario, it was essential for the prophet (P.B.U.H) to have this ability of eloquence at the highest level. We find the expression of numerous and unique literary genres in the orations, addresses, sermons and discourses of Hazrat Muhammad (P.B.U.H). He (P.B.U.H) polished and refined by modification and alteration of former literary devices. His oratory and eloquence brought a revolution in the static literary lives of Arabs. In the modern era, in spite of majestic machinery and inventions, human communication efficiency is as important as was at the time of the pre-Islamic period. The demand of this era is to take help from the sublime examples of eloquent speech and literary genres of the Holy Prophet (P.B.U.H). This article will prove helpful for modern man to adopt the literary style of Hazrat Muhammad (P.B.U.H) and follow the preaching of Islam and also transform them to others.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.982 | 0.983 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".