Effect of microstructure on hydrogen permeation and trapping in natural gas pipeline steels
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examines hydrogen permeation and trapping in three types of natural gas pipeline steels from different decades in Canada-modern, vintage, and legacy steels. Electrochemical permeation experiments were conducted to measure the diffusion coefficient, subsurface concentration, and trap density of hydrogen. The results were analyzed to evaluate the susceptibility of these steels to hydrogen embrittlement and to understand the effects of hydrogen on their mechanical properties. Vintage steel exhibited 50% higher steady-state permeation current and 97% greater effective diffusivity compared to modern steel, while legacy steel showed intermediate values. Hydrogen diffusion increased with grain size and pearlite content but decreased with dislocation density. Modern steel demonstrated the highest resistance to hydrogen permeation due to its finer grain structure and higher dislocation density. This study provides essential insights into the diffusion behavior and trapping mechanisms of hydrogen in natural gas pipeline steels, enhancing the understanding of material performance under hydrogen exposure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it