Carbonation and deformation of oceanic serpentinites in the Elba subduction channel: Evidence for fluid–rock interaction at seismogenic depth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present a multi-disciplinary investigation of the deformation and carbonation history of oceanic serpentinites involved in the plate interface of the Cretaceous-Eocene subduction complex exposed in the Elba Island —an exceptionally well-preserved example of oceanic subduction system. Using an integrated set of structural, petrographic, and geochemical analyses, we document antigorite growth and carbonation of oceanic serpentinites in the Elba subduction channel at shallow-intermediate depths (<22-26 km; P <0.6-0.7 GPa). Carbonation was associated with brecciation and shearing that produced a complex of tectonic slices (Norsi area) and a tectonic mélange (Cavo area). The carbonation process was likely triggered by the release of CO 2 -rich fluids from subducting oceanic serpentinites and ophicarbonate rocks, as indicated by C and O isotopes. The ingress of external CO 2 in shear zones likely ignited a positive feedback between deformation, carbonation, and fluid flow, promoting talc formation and leading to strain localization at the plate interface. The Elba subduction channel offers a unique window on the evolution of subduction systems at low pressure, highlighting the importance of fluid-induced reactions in controlling deformation style.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".