Oxygen treatment and retrieval pathways of divers with diving-related conditions in Townsville, Australia: a 15-year retrospective review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: First aid for injured divers includes oxygen delivery prior to definitive care. Delay to specialist assessment and/or hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT) may be due to dive site remoteness and limited access to facilities. Townsville has the only hyperbaric facility along the Great Barrier Reef. Analysis of oxygen therapy and retrieval pathways of divers treated in Townsville may assist with establishing future education strategies and resource allocation. Methods: Data were retrospectively collected on divers assessed at the Townsville hyperbaric medicine unit from November 2003 through December 2018. Demographics, dive incident location, oxygen treatment, retrieval platform and pathway, and initial disease grade were reviewed. Data are presented as frequencies and percentages. Results: A total of 306 cases were included (184 males). Divers typically received oxygen therapy (87%, 267/305 known) prior to specialist review. The non-rebreather mask was the most frequently used (44%, 28/63) followed by in-water recompression (24%, 15/63). While 34% of the divers were retrieved from the scene (n = 104), only 11 (11%, 11/104) were retrieved directly to Townsville. Most divers initially classified as severe were retrieved from the scene (82%, 27/33), only two directly to Townsville. Fifteen cases had three retrieval legs (5%, 15/306). Conclusions: Most injured divers received oxygen first aid and were transported to Townsville for definitive care with a variable number of retrieval stages. Continuing education of retrieval physicians should address knowledge of diving related injuries and highlight cases that may benefit from expedited transfer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".