MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411370876 · doi:10.1101/2025.06.11.659204

Selective inhibition of MR1-restricted T cell activation by a novel MR1-targeting nanobody

2025· preprint· en· W4411370876 on OpenAlexafffund
Timothy Bates, Corinna A. Kulicke, Sintayehu K Gurmessa, Se-Jin Kim, Sushant Suresh, Jules B. Weinstein, Audrey Hinchliff, John E. Burke, David Lewinsohn, Fikadu Tafesse

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Victoria
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthMichael Smith Health Research BC
KeywordsCell biologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract MR1 is a non-polymorphic, ubiquitously expressed, MHC class I-like antigen-presenting molecule that presents small-molecule metabolites to T cells. Studies have shown that MR1 plays a role in microbial infection, inflammation, and tumor immunity. The antigens it presents include metabolites of microbial and self-origin as well as small-molecule drugs and form stable complexes with MR1 that are displayed on the cell surface to activate T cells. However, unlike classical MHC I and II molecules, the fundamental biology of MR1 remains poorly understood, particularly the mechanisms governing antigen loading and intracellular trafficking. This knowledge gap is largely due to the lack of molecular tools available to precisely manipulate MR1 function. In this study, we describe a high-affinity (1.6 nM K D ) anti-MR1 nanobody, MR1Nb1. We characterize the binding of this nanobody including affinity by ELISA and kinetics by BLI. Crucially, we map the binding epitope of MR1Nb1 on MR1 by HDX-MS, providing key insights into the mechanism through which it blocks MR1T cell activation. In functional assays MR1Nb1 effectively and specifically blocks MAIT cell activation by cells infected with M. tuberculosis or treated with M. smegmatis supernatant. This nanobody represents a unique and versatile tool for the field, as it can be produced inexpensively and expressed intracellularly within antigen-presenting cells. Hence, our study provides a powerful new molecular probe for dissecting the mechanistic underpinnings of MR1 biology and uncover its broader roles in immunity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryFrench-language works237,207