MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411370992 · doi:10.1103/r8jt-1xpk

Soft-hard framework with exact four-momentum conservation for small systems

2025· article· en· W4411370992 on OpenAlexafffund
W. Zhao, Abhijit Majumder, Chun Shen, J. Putschke, B. Boudreaux, A. Angerami, R. Arora, Steffen A. Bass, Y. Chen, Rashmi Datta, Lipei Du, R. J. Ehlers, Rainer J. Fries, Charles Gale, Yayun He, B. V. Jacak, P.M. Jacobs, Sangyong Jeon, Yi Ji, L. Kasper, M. Kelsey, M. Kordell, Amit Kumar, R. Kunnawalkam Elayavalli, Joseph Latessa, Y.-J. Lee, R. Lemmon, Matthew Luzum, Simon Mak, Andi Mankolli, C. De Martín, H. Mehryar, T. Mengel, C. Nattrass, J. Norman, Charles Thomas Parker, Jean-François Paquet, Hendrik Roch, G. Roland, B. Schenke, L. Schwiebert, A. Sengupta, Mayank Singh, C. Sirimanna, D. Soeder, R. A. Soltz, Y. Tachibana, J. Velkovska, G. Vujanovic, X.-N. Wang, Xiang-Yu Wu

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ReginaMcGill University
FundersOffice of the Vice President for Research and PartnershipsNuclear PhysicsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOffice of ScienceAcademy of FinlandNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaUniversity of ReginaFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloU.S. Department of EnergyEuropean Research CouncilWayne State UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsComputer scienceConservation lawPhysicsMathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new framework, called , for the combined study of both hard and soft transverse momentum sectors in high-energy proton-proton ( <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <a:mrow> <a:mi>p</a:mi> <a:mtext>−</a:mtext> <a:mi>p</a:mi> </a:mrow> </a:math> ) and proton-nucleus ( <b:math xmlns:b="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <b:mrow> <b:mi>p</b:mi> <b:mtext>−</b:mtext> <b:mi>A</b:mi> </b:mrow> </b:math> ) collisions is set up. A dynamical initial state is set up using the model with transverse locations of hotspots within each incoming nucleon. A hard scattering that emanates from two colliding hotspots is carried out using the Pythia generator. Initial state radiation from the incoming hard partons is carried out in a new module called , which includes the longitudinal location of initial splits. The energy-momentum of both the initial hard partons and their associated beam remnants is removed from the hot spots, depleting the energy-momentum available for the formation of the bulk medium. Outgoing showers are simulated using the generator, and results are presented for both cases, allowing for and not allowing for energy loss. First comparisons between this hard-soft model and single inclusive hadron and jet data from <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <c:mrow> <c:mi>p</c:mi> <c:mtext>−</c:mtext> <c:mi>p</c:mi> </c:mrow> </c:math> and minimum bias <d:math xmlns:d="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <d:mrow> <d:mi>p</d:mi> <d:mtext>−</d:mtext> <d:mtext>Pb</d:mtext> </d:mrow> </d:math> collisions are presented. Single hadron spectra in <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <e:mrow> <e:mi>p</e:mi> <e:mtext>−</e:mtext> <e:mi>p</e:mi> </e:mrow> </e:math> are used to carry out a limited (in number of parameters) Bayesian calibration of the model. Fair comparisons with data are indicative of the utility of this new framework. Theoretical studies of the correlation between jet <f:math xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <f:msub> <f:mi>p</f:mi> <f:mi>T</f:mi> </f:msub> </f:math> and event activity at mid and forward rapidity are carried out.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.865
Threshold uncertainty score0.398

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesFrench-language works237,207