MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411371115 · doi:10.1016/j.xkme.2025.101051

Gender-affirming Hormone Therapy and Changes in Kidney Function in Adults: A Retrospective Population-based Study

2025· article· en· W4411371115 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Silvia J. Leon, Thomas W. Ferguson, Reid Whitlock, Clara Bohm, Paul Komenda, Claudio Rigatto, Navdeep Tangri, Nathalie Saad, Ted Jablonski, Kathleen E. Moncrieff, Sofia B. Ahmed, Raymond Fung, Tehmina Ahmad, Ron Wald, Bikrampal Sidhu, Christine White, Rachel Bond, Louis Bondaz, Annie-Claire Nadeau-Fredette, Irena Druce, Gregory L. Hundemer, Karthik Tennankore, Marshall Dahl, Adeera Levin, Anna C. Rogers, Adam Burgess, Emily Christie, David Collister

Bibliographic record

VenueKidney Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityUniversity of OttawaHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontQueen's UniversityOttawa HospitalUniversity Health NetworkToronto East General HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversité de MontréalUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of British ColumbiaToronto Western HospitalUniversity of ManitobaSt. Michael's HospitalSeven Oaks General Hospital
FundersUniversity of Manitoba
KeywordsRetrospective cohort studyMedicineHormone therapyRenal functionHormonePopulationInternal medicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rationale & Objective: Gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) modifies lean body mass and body fat but its impact on kidney function is uncertain. We sought to evaluate the association of GAHT with kidney function and clinical outcomes. Study Design: A retrospective observational cohort study using linked health administrative databases. Setting & Participants: Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) adults in Manitoba, Canada from January 1, 2007, to March 31, 2018. Exposure: GAHT or no GAHT prescriptions. Outcomes: The primary outcome was the change in serum creatinine levels. Secondary outcomes included the change in urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio, incident acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, and hypertension. Analytical Approach: Outcomes were assessed for up to 2 years. Participants were censored at 3 months post-GAHT prescription if it was not refilled. Outcomes between TGD adults treated with and without GAHT (stratified by sex assigned at birth) were compared using multivariable linear regression and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: We identified 396 TGD adults assigned female at birth (AFAB) (277 receiving GAHT) and 322 TGD adults assigned male at birth (AMAB) (240 receiving GAHT) with longitudinal kidney function measurements. In AFAB persons treated with GAHT compared with no GAHT, serum creatinine levels increased from baseline at 18 months (+7.0 μmol/L, 95% CI, 0.5-14) and 21 months (+10.7 μmol/L, 95% CI, 3-18) but not at any other time point including 24 months. There were no differences in changes in creatinine in AMAB persons treated with GAHT compared with no GAHT. AFAB and AMAB persons initiating GAHT had no significant increased risks of incident chronic kidney disease or hypertension. Limitations: Limited sample size, missing data, and residual confounding. Conclusions: GAHT is associated with an increase in serum creatinine levels in AFAB persons. Additional research is needed to further evaluate the effect of GAHT on kidney function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.947

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKidney MedicineSame topicLGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyFrench-language works237,207