Significance of Usability and Accessibility in Cyber-Banking
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Electronic commerce or e-commerce has a significant impact on the global economic environment. However, recent developments show technology and applications are increasingly paying more attention to mobile computing, the wireless Web, and mobile commerce. Because of this, much research has been done on the acceptance of mobile banking, or cyber-banking, as a significant channel for distribution. For many, though, this method is still relatively new. Thus, cyber-banking is examined and summarized in the current qualitative study in multiple areas, such as age, gender, education level, occupation, and technology expertise. The most significant difficulty was estimating how users will use it. A total of 180 respondents completed the questionnaire. Since 21% did not use cyber-banking, they were excluded from further analysis. Data analysis was performed on the remaining 142 surveys. The survey had versatile and open results because it was done online and offline. Via qualitative analysis, the results demonstrated that adopting cyber-banking was uneven in specific ways since it frequently depends on the acceptance of technology and its advancements. It also showed that most people's attitudes, perceived utility, and compatibility with their devices and lifestyles were critical factors in their decision to use cyber-banking services in their daily lives. Keywords: Cyber-banking, bank digitalization, mobile banking, banking technology, online assistance service
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.029 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".