A Robust Association Test Leveraging Unknown Genetic Interactions: Application to Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For complex traits such as lung disease in Cystic Fibrosis (CF), Gene x Gene or Gene x Environment interactions can impact disease severity but these remain largely unknown. Unaccounted-for genetic interactions introduce a distributional shift in the quantitative trait across the genotypic groups. Joint location and scale tests, or full distributional differences across genotype groups can account for unknown genetic interactions and increase power for gene identification compared with the conventional association test. Here we propose a new joint location and scale test (JLS), a quantile regression-basd JLS (qJLS), that addresses previous limitations. Specifically, qJLS is free of distributional assumptions, thus applies to non-Gaussian traits; is as powerful as the existing JLS tests under Gaussian traits; and is computationally efficient for genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Our simulation studies, which model unknown genetic interactions, demonstrate that qJLS is robust to skewed and heavy-tailed error distributions and is as powerful as other JLS tests in the literature under normality. Without any unknown genetic interaction, qJLS shows a large increase in power with non-Gaussian traits over conventional association tests and is slightly less powerful under normality. We apply the qJLS method to the Canadian CF Gene Modifier Study (n = 1,997) and identified a genome-wide significant variant, rs9513900 on chromosome 13, that had not previously been reported to contribute to CF lung disease. qJLS provides a powerful alternative to conventional genetic association tests, where interactions may contribute to a quantitative trait.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.027 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".