Réparations et concurrences des mémoires de la Seconde Guerre mondiale au Canada : l’exemple des anciens combattants canadiens prisonniers au Japon et des Canadiens japonais (1984-1998)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article examine les mécanismes mémoriels concernant les mémoires collectives de la Seconde Guerre mondiale des Canadiens japonais et des anciens combattants canadiens faits prisonniers au Japon. À travers l’étude des relations mémorielles entre ces deux groupes (à partir majoritairement de sources privées, associatives et de presse), l’objectif est d’identifier ce qui oppose et ce qui rassemble ces mémoires concurrentes, pour mieux cerner les enjeux touchant les mémoires de la Seconde Guerre mondiale au Canada. Il en ressort une volonté de confrontation de la part des vétérans, menant à une concurrence mémorielle visant notamment à minimiser l’expérience d’autrui. Ce phénomène s’explique par le sentiment de ces anciens combattants d’être dans un angle mort de la mémoire de la guerre et cherchant donc à obtenir une médiatisation nationale à travers les tensions avec les Canadiens japonais. Cet article montre également que ces différentes mémoires, au-delà de la simple confrontation, se construisent par ces interactions mutuelles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".