Association between serum testosterone and measures of cardiovascular health among transgender individuals using gender-affirming testosterone therapy: a cross-sectional study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gender-affirming testosterone therapy (GATT) use may be associated with increased systolic blood pressure (SBP). The association between serum testosterone and cardiovascular health in individuals using GATT is unknown. The objective of this study was to estimate the association between serum testosterone and validated measures of cardiovascular health, including SBP and arterial stiffness, in persons assigned female sex at birth using GATT. METHODS: Healthy participants assigned female sex at birth on a stable GATT regimen for ≥ 4 months were recruited to this community-partnered exploratory cross-sectional study. Exposures of interest were total and free serum testosterone concentration. As our primary outcome, SBP was measured by an automated sphygmomanometer, and carotid-radial pulse wave velocity (PWVcr) and aortic augmentation index (AIx) were used to measure arterial stiffness via applanation tonometry. RESULTS: Participants (n = 18, median age 28 years, range: 18, 50) who predominantly self-identified as white (94%) and had been using GATT for a median of 48 months (range: 5, 84) were studied. Resting SBP, PWVcr, and AIx were 113 mmHg (range: 102, 129), 7 m/s (range: 4, 9), and 9% (range: - 10, 23), respectively. Total and free serum testosterone were not significantly associated with SBP or PWVcr. Free, but not total, serum testosterone was positively associated with AIx (p = 0.03). Sensitivity analyses did not modify any results. CONCLUSIONS: In healthy transgender individuals, serum testosterone concentrations may not be associated with measures of cardiovascular health. However, these results need to be interpreted with caution given the limited sample size.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".