Diversity and development of the hemibacula of croaking geckos (Sphaerodactylidae: <i>Aristelliger</i> )
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Among squamates, hemipenes are known to evolve rapidly and exhibit diverse shapes, sizes, and ornamentation. Croaking geckos (Aristelliger) are unique among geckos in exhibiting mineralized structures (hemibacula) in their hemipenes. We here describe the gross morphology of the hemibacula of each currently recognized species of Aristelliger, document hemibacular histology, and report on hemibaculum development. We confirm the presence of hemibacula in all currently recognized species and demonstrate that three distinct morphologies correspond to three putative clades in the genus. Histology revealed that hemibacula are superficially similar to chondroid bone and composed of mineralized dense connective tissue covered in a thin layer of epidermis with alcian-positive cells embedded within a mineralized matrix. Additionally, we demonstrate that hemibacula do not develop until past the onset of sexual maturity and that hemibaculum length scales isometrically with body size. We hypothesize that hemibacula of Aristelliger develop via peramorphosis, a phenomenon also expressed in the cranial morphology of this genus. Additionally, we speculate on the functional significance of these enigmatic structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".