Relationship between early musical training and detection of binaural gap based on interaural correlation change
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: The auditory fusion of binaural sounds and the perceived auditory image are determined by the similarities of the sounds at the two ears. Sensitivity to the change in interaural correlation, a measure of interaural similarity, is crucial to extract target sound from noisy background. Although musicians have been found to perform better than non-musicians in various types of auditory processing tasks such as frequency discrimination or temporal resolution, the relationship between musical training and the interaural correlation processing remains poorly understood. Methods: Here we embedded a fragment of interaurally uncorrelated noises (interaural correlation = 0) into the interaurally identical marker noises (interaural correlation = 1) and constructed a binaural gap based on the change in interaural correlation (from 1 to 0 then back to 1). The minimum duration of interaurally uncorrelated fragment for detecting the binaural gap (duration threshold) was determined for groups of young adults without musical training and those who started musical training early (before 7 years of age) or late (after 8 years of age). Results: When the binaural noises arrived simultaneously (Experiment 1), we found that the duration threshold was significantly correlated with the onset age of musical training for the early-trained musicians but no such significant correlation was observed for the late-trained musicians. Moreover, the duration thresholds for the early-trained musicians were significantly shorter than those for both the late-trained musicians and non-musicians. When interaural delay was introduced (Experiment 2), this early-musical-training-related enhancement in interaural correlation processing was maintained for binaural noises when the interaural delay was 2 ms, while no enhancement was found when the interaural delay was 4 ms. Discussion: Our findings suggest that sensitivity to dynamic changes in interaural correlation might be influenced by musical training in early childhood, implying a sensitive period when musical training has a significant impact on interaural correlation processing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".