MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411389714 · doi:10.1097/rlu.0000000000005995

Impact of Field-of-view Zooming and Segmentation Batches on Radiomics Features Reproducibility and Machine Learning Performance in Thyroid Scintigraphy

2025· article· en· W4411389714 on OpenAlexaff
Soroush Bagheri, Ghasem Hajianfar, Maziar Sabouri, Omid Gharibi, Babak Yazdani, Atena Aghaee, Ali Mohammad Nickfarjam, Akram Yazdani, Akbar Aliasgharzadeh, Habiballah Moradi, Arman Rahmim, Habib Zaidi

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Nuclear Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungNational Science Foundation
KeywordsReproducibilityArtificial intelligenceMedicineSegmentationIntraclass correlationPattern recognition (psychology)Feature (linguistics)Nuclear medicineRadiologyComputer scienceMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Thyroid diseases are the second most common hormonal disorders, necessitating accurate diagnostics. Advances in artificial intelligence and radiomics have enhanced diagnostic precision by analyzing quantitative imaging features. However, reproducibility challenges arising from factors such as the field-of-view (FOV) zooming and segmentation variability limit the clinical application of radiomic-based models. AIM: This study focuses on evaluating the impact of segmentation and FOV zooming on the reproducibility of radiomic features and improved performance of machine learning (ML) when using reproducible features for classification of thyroid scintigraphy images into normal, diffuse goiter (DG), multinodular goiter (MNG), and thyroiditis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 872 thyroid scintigraphy cases from 3 centers. Radiomic feature reproducibility was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), with robust features (ICC≥0.80) identified under segmentation and zooming conditions. Four ML training scenarios were implemented to train models on Center A data, including (1) all, (2) zoom-robust, (3) segmentation-robust, and (4) mutually robust features, with 3 feature selection methods and 7 classifiers. Models were validated on external data sets (centers B and C). RESULTS: FOV zooming significantly reduced feature reproducibility (ICC≥0.80: 49%), while segmentation effects were minimal (ICC≥0.80: 96%). Models trained on mutually robust features outperformed those trained using all features. Boruta-MLP achieved the highest accuracy (0.71, P -value <0.001 vs. all features) in zoomed data sets, and RFE-MLP performed best (0.69, P -value <0.001 vs. all features) in the baseline data set, with Gray-Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) features frequently selected. CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing robust radiomic features significantly improved the performance of ML models in thyroid disease classification, enabling more accurate and generalizable diagnostic outcomes across diverse data sets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.107
Threshold uncertainty score0.340

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Nuclear MedicineSame topicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207