Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article focuses on Emperor Akbar's manipulation and elevation of a new religion "Din-e-Elahi" to handle the state of political matters during his reign and that was, according to the Muslim orthodox, against the basic canons of Islamic scriptural message. Akbar is the most urbane and triumphant Emperor (1556-1605) in Mughal Empire (1525-1858). The period of Akbar's rule has been regarded as one of the most significant and incomparable periods in Indian history in particular regarding Hindu Muslim interaction. Akbar's motivation and intention behind this new configuration, and the alteration in Islamic and the Quranic basics, was just political rather than religious. His new wave towards the transformation and so-called religious reformation, "Ṣulḥ-i-kul," (Absolute Peace) was just that he wanted to have stability in autocracy and strengthen his administrative grip. The objectives of this research are to know how Akbar’s motivation in creating a policy of syncretic Din-e-Elahi and his thought contribution towards Indian people. This research uses literary or library research with historical approaches by incentivizing widely, critically, and deeply reading references relating to Akbar’s thought, critical evaluation, and the best elements of all. The result of this research indicates that his policy of syncretic Din-e-Elahi purely promoted racial tolerance and religious freedom under the policy of “Universal Tolerance”. He knew how a Muslim ruler could govern over the Hindu majority country. To have a strong relationship with a predominant nation, he tried to attract them with new tact and propagated so-called brotherhood, interreligious harmony, and tolerance by mingling it with mysticism, philosophy, and nature-worship. His thought contributions then influence the daily life and culture of the Indians such as harmony in an interreligious community far better than before. He also constitutes a symbol of liberalism and secularism then reflected by modern India.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.974 | 0.974 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".