MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411394518 · doi:10.1177/21925682251351943

Craniocervical Junction and Upper Cervical Spine Fractures: Historical Systems and Advancements with the AO Spine Classification

2025· review· en· W4411394518 on OpenAlexaff
Barry Ting Sheen Kweh, Alexander R. Vaccaro, Gregory D. Schroeder, José A. Canseco, Maximilian Reinhold, Mohamed M. Aly, Sebastian F. Bigdon, Mohammad El‐Sharkawi, Richard J. Bransford, Andrei Fernandes Joaquim, Harvinder Singh Chhabra, Emiliano Vialle, Rishi Mugesh Kanna, Charlotte Dandurand, F. Cumhur Öner, Jin Tee

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Spine Journal · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Canadian institutionsVancouver General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCervical spineSPINE (molecular biology)Surgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Study DesignSystematic Review.ObjectivesTo describe existing craniocervical junction and upper cervical spine classification systems and their integration into a unified rational hierarchical system of the AO Spine Upper Cervical Injury Classification System (UCIC).MethodsA systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Databases was performed in keeping with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.Results859 articles were identified which yielded 10 established classification systems for injuries of the occipital condyles, craniocervical junction as well as atlas and axis. All systems were either non-hierarchical, conferred minimal clinical significance or failed to consider neurological status of patients. For example, the Traynelis classification simply relies upon describing the direction of displacement which has dubious clinical significance. Similarly, the Jefferson description of atlas fractures simply grades injuries by fracture line pattern. The AO Spine UCIC system synthesizes each published historical scheme into a rational graded method by which clinicians can assess the severity of injuries to this region. The three grades of injury range from type A being generally stable bony injuries, type B constituting potentially unstable (osseoligamentous) injuries and type C representing grossly unstable translational injuries.ConclusionThe AO Spine UCIC System is a validated methodology of integrating historical landmark grading systems and evolving this into a structured means of grading severity of injuries to guide timely clinical management. The implementation of this universal system will enable clinicians to consistently assess craniocervical junction injuries and implement appropriate management strategies. Future studies will examine outcomes after operative or non-operative management with progression to a standardized quantified algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.035
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.089
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.186

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0350.089
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.004
Bibliometrics0.0190.022
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Spine JournalSame topicSpinal Fractures and Fixation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207