Intraparticle entanglement in noisy quantum channels: degradation and revival through amplitude damping
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quantum correlations between two or more different degrees of freedom of the same particle are sometimes referred to as intraparticle entanglement. In this work, we study these intraparticle correlations between two different degrees of freedom under various decoherence channels, viz. amplitude damping, depolarizing, and phase damping channels. We mainly focus on the amplitude-damping channel for which we obtain an exact analytical expression for the concurrence of an arbitrary initial pure state. In this channel, we observe the unique feature of entanglement arising from a separable initial state. We show that this channel allows for a revival of entanglement with an increasing damping parameter, including from a zero value of the concurrence. We also consider the amplitude-damping channel for interparticle entanglement and show that it does not display any of the above-mentioned interesting features. Further, for comparable parameters, the decay of entanglement in the interparticle system is much greater than in the intraparticle system, which we also find to be true for the phase damping and depolarizing channels. Thus, intraparticle entanglement subjected to damping is much more robust than interparticle entanglement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".