MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411396143 · doi:10.1161/svin.124.001690

PICASSO (Proximal Internal Carotid Artery Acute Stroke Secondary to Tandem Lesion or Local Occlusion)  Thrombectomy Randomized Trial: Study Protocol and Rationale

2025· article· en· W4411396143 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sami Al Kasab, Thanh N. Nguyen, Mohamad Abdalkader, Ansaar Rai, SoHyun Boo, Tareq Kass‐Hout, Michael C. Hurley, Ali Sultan‐Qurraie, Eugene Lin, Curtis A. Given, Lucas Elijovich, Aamir Badruddin, Nazli Janjua, Richard Jung, Priyank Khandelwal, Christopher Southwood, Aniel Majjhoo, Waldo R. Guerrero, Nils Mueller‐Kronast, Amer Alshekhlee, Juan Carlos Martínez-Gutiérrez, Mohamad Ezzeldin, Marshall C. Cress, Muhammad Khizar Niazi, Alexandra Paúl, Brian Snelling, Anmar Razak, Ramesh Grandhi, Larry Morgan, Fabio Settecase, Joey English, Patricia Fernández, Haralabos Zacharatos, Matthew R. Alexander, Kaiz Asif, Kimberly Kicielinski, H Cuellar, Kaustubh Limaye, Michael Abraham, Shadi Yaghi, Adam de Havenon, Mohammed Almekhlafi, Italo Linfante, Mohamed Teleb, Götz Thomalla, Daryl R. Gress, Wade S. Smith, Scott Brown, Jasmine M. Olvany, Laila A. Ibrahim, Osama O. Zaidat

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke Vascular and Interventional Neurology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineModified Rankin ScaleOcclusionStroke (engine)Carotid stentingStenosisRandomized controlled trialInternal carotid arteryMiddle cerebral arteryThrombolysisRadiologySurgeryInternal medicineIschemiaCarotid endarterectomyMyocardial infarctionIschemic stroke

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The optimal treatment of acute large vessel occlusion with concomitant extracranial steno-occlusive disease of the internal carotid artery remains unclear. The PICASSO (Proximal Internal Carotid Artery Acute Stroke Secondary to Tandem or Local Occlusion Thrombectomy Trial) randomized clinical trial is designed to answer the question whether acute carotid stenting is superior to a nonacute stenting approach in the setting of a tandem lesion or tandem occlusion. Methods: PICASSO is a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter, open label, assessor-blinded acute ischemic stroke trial with pragmatic design enrolling up to 404 patients at up to 60 sites. Patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion with severe stenosis or complete occlusion (70%-100%) of the extracranial carotid artery who meet the imaging and clinical eligibility criteria will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo mechanical thrombectomy of the intracranial lesion plus emergent stenting of the extracranial lesion versus mechanical thrombectomy plus no stenting up to 16 hours from last known well. Results: The primary efficacy outcome is the ordinal shift of 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. The primary analysis will be based on the intention-to-treat principle stratified by the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT [Computed Tomography] Score (7-8 versus 9-10), degree of proximal carotid stenosis (70%-90% versus 91%-100%), NIHSS (≤ 10 versus > 10), and use of intravenous thrombolysis. The primary safety outcome is symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Secondary outcomes include 1-year mRS (dichotomized and ordinal), successful reperfusion, and vessel patency at follow-up. Subgroup analyses will include comparison of intravenous versus oral antiplatelets in the stenting arm, and treatment of proximal intracranial occlusion first versus a simultaneous approach. Conclusion: PICASSO is a pragmatic randomized trial, designed to address the safety and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy with acute carotid stenting versus nonacute stenting with or without delayed revascularization treatment in patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion and concomitant extracranial severe stenosis or complete occlusion. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05611242.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.131

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke Vascular and Interventional NeurologySame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207