Bibliographic record
Abstract
Islam is a comprehensive and universal religion that has been granted through Hazrat Muhammad (PBUH); the last messenger of ALLAH. Its beauty lies in the fact that the preaching of Islam will continue until the day of Resurrection. After the demise of Holy Prophet (PBUH), it is incumbent upon every Muslim man and woman to play their part in preaching of this religion. A society can only be reformed when there are people who encourage good deeds and prevent others from evil deeds. If we take a look at the efforts of today’s Muslims for Islam, we find men working for the cause to some extent but women are almost none. In fact, today, women are greater in number as compared to men in past, which is why they need to work even more in this domain. While the women who were educated are trained in the company of Holy Prophet (PBUH), played a vital role in this sector. Knowledge about the core concepts of Islam, domestic life and intricate problems related specifically to women came only through the mothers of the Believers (Ummahat ul momimeen) and their Companions (Sahabiyaat), but today’s women have left this field empty. The few women who are working for the cause mostly emphasize on preaching and training without knowing the psychology of their audience, which causes harm instead of benefit. Therefore, this research paper will discuss that how the female companions of prophet Muhammad (PBUH); i.e. Sahabiyaat, used to preach and train listeners keeping in view the psychological aspects of audience and because of this wise approach, they were immediately ready to act. The fact that how by adopting the said method, today’s society can be reformed, will also be discussed in this paper.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.994 | 0.967 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".