Improving the diagnosis of hyperphagia in melanocortin‐4 receptor pathway diseases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Characteristics of hyperphagia include heightened and prolonged hunger, longer time to satiation, shorter duration of satiety, severe preoccupation with food (i.e., hyperphagic drive), abnormal food-seeking behaviors, and distress or functional impairment when food is unavailable. Patients with melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) pathway diseases including those caused by variants in one of multiple key genes of the pathway often present with hyperphagia that results in early-onset, severe obesity because this pathway plays a critical role in regulation of hunger/satiation and energy balance. Patients with syndromic obesity (e.g., Bardet-Biedl syndrome) may also have hyperphagia as a result of neurodevelopmental disruptions in the MC4R pathway. Genetic testing is suggested in patients with early-onset, severe obesity and clinical features of genetic obesity (e.g., hyperphagia, neurodevelopmental differences, dysmorphic features); however, only a small percentage of individuals who meet these criteria undergo testing, potentially owing to limited availability, overlapping symptoms with other obesity types, and infrequent use of genetic testing during diagnosis. Diagnosing hyperphagia may be challenging, as no guidelines have been established for individuals with MC4R pathway diseases. Identifying these individuals is crucial to addressing the challenges of hyperphagia and associated obesity, which often limit quality of life and place overwhelming burdens on patients and families.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".