Bibliographic record
Abstract
Imam Fakhar ul din Hasan bin Mansoor Aozjandi Farghani al murginani (592) is the most learned jurist of Hanfi school of thought in the 6th century. He is ranked among the few Ashab-e-Tarjih like Imam-e-Hidaya and Imam-e-Shami. According to Ibn-e-Kamal Pasha, Qazi Khan is one of the most distinguished researchers of Fiqh among the seven ranks of jurists. Not only that, Salman Mansoor puri, a great Mufti (Deo Band school of thought) rightly entitles Hasan bin Mansoor as Mujtahid fil Masail [jurist of contemporary issues]. Also he has declared him as Mujtahid while Imam Hidaya and Imam Shami have been considered as Ashab-e-Tarjih.Qazi khan’s work in Fiqh known as Fatawa Qazi khan consists of three volumes. First time, This book was published from Beirut without publishing date still. This Ftawa has deep impacts on the later Ftawas of Hanfi school of thought. In contrast with other ftawas, which are written in the form of questions answers, Ftawa Qazi khan is compiled according to the pattern of educational volume. It is a comprehensive guideline and primary source for the later Ftawas of Hanfi school of thought. In fact, the Ftawa has been frequently cited in Ftawa Shami as 264 times, Ftawa Rizvia 1570 times, Ftawa Alamgiri 2776 times and many more in other latest Ftawas like as Ahsan ulfatawa,Fatawa Rashedia , Fatawwa Usmani, Fatawa TatarKhania ,Fatawa Fareedia etc which clearly manifests its worth and prestige. Despite being the primary source for the above mentioned prominent Ftawas, Ftawa Qazi Khan is the least known to the public in common. In the true sense the Ftawa is an encyclopedia for the students of Fiqh. Therefore, this article precisely highlights the life and significant work of Qazi Khan. This research focuses on his modern approach to solve ambiguities in social life in the light of Islamic jurisprudence. The researcher has used descriptive research methodology in this piece of literature to discover the desired outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.976 | 0.989 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".