MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Microstructural alterations of the trigeminal ganglion in chronic ocular surface pain patients: A diffusion MRI study

2025· article· en· W4411405785 on OpenAlexaff
Alpen Ortuğ, Nicholas Reyes, Anat Galor, David Valdés-Arias, Ema Karakoleva, Cameron Talbert, Nicholas Pondelis, Pradip M. Pattany, Elizabeth R. Felix, Scott A. Holmes, David Zurakowski, Barry Sessle, Emi Takahashi, Eric A. Moulton

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroImage · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOphthalmology and Eye Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Eye InstituteOffice of Research and DevelopmentHealth Services Research and DevelopmentU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
KeywordsTrigeminal ganglionMedicineDiffusion MRIGanglionDiffusionOphthalmologyMagnetic resonance imagingAnatomyNeuroscienceRadiologyPsychologyPhysicsSensory system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Noxious stimuli to the ocular surface are encoded by sensory axons of trigeminal ganglion (TG) neurons and conveyed through the ophthalmic branch of the trigeminal nerve (CN V1). We hypothesized that chronic ocular surface pain (COSP) may be associated with microstructural alterations of the trigeminal nerve structures. Our objective was to demonstrate the feasibility of using diffusion tractography to identify and analyze diffusion properties to assess TG microstructure in individuals with and without COSP. Forty COSP patients (27 males and 13 females; mean age: 56.2 ± 11.9 yrs; range: 34-77 yrs) and 17 controls without pain (15 males and 2 females; mean age: 55.4 ± 8.9 yrs, range: 37-66 yrs) were included in the study. Using 3T diffusion MRI (dMRI), we performed tractography to reconstruct TG and CN V1 with a generalized q-sampling imaging (GQI) algorithm. dMRI-based indices such as normalized quantitative anisotropy (NQA), fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AD), and radial diffusivity (RD) were recorded for the right and left TG. TG (n = 45) were successfully reconstructed. Fourteen participants (11 COSP, 3 controls) were excluded because TG could not be clearly visualized. A significant decrease in NQA (p = 0.03), MD (p = 0.04) and RD (p = 0.04) were found in the left TG, but not in the right TG (p = 0.40; p = 0.58; p = 0.64 respectively), in the COSP group as compared to controls. Decrease in these metrics are generally interpreted as indicators of axonal loss and fiber integrity, suggesting the presence of fiber damage in the left TG of patients with COSP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.260

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroImageSame topicOphthalmology and Eye DisordersFrench-language works237,207