Evaluating Risk Factors for Lethality in Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review and Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is frequently the sole curative treatment for a range of hematologic and nonhematologic disorders. One of the most notable neurological complications associated with HSCT is posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES), which affects approximately 1 to 10% of pediatric recipients. Although usually reversible, PRES can lead to serious morbidity and lethality. This systematic review and individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis aims to evaluate risk factors for lethality and characterize the clinical course of PRES in pediatric HSCT patients. Studies reporting PRES in pediatric HSCT recipients with data on outcomes and risk factors were included. Data were sourced from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase (last search: October 20, 2024). IPD were extracted from articles or requested from corresponding authors. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. A one-stage IPD meta-analysis evaluated associations between risk factors and lethality and descriptive analyses reported the clinical course of PRES in the included population. Among 175 pediatric patients with PRES across 15 studies, the mean age was 8.68 years, and 64.8% were male. PRES occurred on average 73.08 days post-HSCT presenting with seizures (90.3%), hypertension (87.8%), altered mental status (31.9%), headache (28.5%), visual disturbances (27.1%), and atypical presentations (24.3%). Neuroimaging findings indicated that 12.3% of cases involved only anterior or posterior brain circulation, while most (75.4%) demonstrated dual circulation involvement, with bilateral cerebral involvement observed in 89.8% of patients. The overall lethality rate was 32.5%. The meta-analysis reported an overall prevalence of 7% for PRES among pediatric recipients of HSCT. The IPD meta-analysis revealed no significant associations between lethality and factors such as age (p = 0.590), sex (p = 0.516), atypical PRES presentations (p = 0.642), or the specific cerebral circulation involved (p = 0.758). Conversely, acute graft-versus-host disease demonstrated a trend toward statistical significance for association with lethality (p = 0.056). Additionally, underlying malignant disease (odds ratio [OR]: 2.635, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.256–5.529, p = 0.01), the use of cord blood as a cell source (OR: 5.692, 95% CI: 1.241–26.109, p = 0.025), and transplantation from an unrelated donor (OR: 4.948, 95% CI: 2.176–11.249, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with increased lethality risk. Malignant underlying disease, cord blood transplantation, and unrelated donors significantly increase lethality risk in pediatric HSCT recipients with PRES. These findings underscore the importance of tailored management strategies to identify and monitor at-risk pediatric HSCT recipients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.037 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.016 | 0.038 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".