MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411408336 · doi:10.1109/jestpe.2025.3581143

Variable Switching Frequency Control for Efficiency and Power Density Improvement of a GaN-Based Traction Inverter for EV Applications

2025· article· en· W4411408336 on OpenAlexafffund
Philip Korta, Animesh Kundu, K. Lakshmi Varaha Iyer, Narayan C. Kar

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsMagna International (Canada)University of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsInverterSwitching frequencyTraction (geology)Electrical engineeringPower (physics)Materials scienceElectronic engineeringOptoelectronicsVoltageEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wide–band gap (WBG) semiconductor devices have gained significant interest over conventional silicon (Si) insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) devices for traction inverters in electric vehicle (EV) propulsion applications due to their improved energy efficiency and power density. This paper investigates the utilization of Gallium Nitride’s (GaN) fast switching capability towards further efficiency and power density increase in a traction inverter application. An electrothermal model of the GaN inverter is developed and the model’s efficiency map is compared to experimental measurements to validate the accuracy to within 0.3% efficiency or 100 W loss difference in most operating regions. A novel variable switching frequency strategy is proposed that considers the DC link voltage ripple limitations to increase inverter efficiency up to 5% in comparison to a fixed switching frequency approach. The variable switching frequency technique is combined with the fast switching capability of GaN to achieve a 35.7% reduction in capacitor size while achieving improved drive cycle efficiency with increased inverter power density.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.888
Threshold uncertainty score0.533

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power ElectronicsSame topicAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersFrench-language works237,207