MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4411410595 · doi:10.1101/2025.06.17.25329748

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and typhoid conjugate vaccine introduction on typhoid fever in Nepal

2025· preprint· en· W4411410595 on OpenAlexaff
Dipesh Tamrakar, Shivram Naga, Esther Jung, Basudha Shrestha, Pratibha Bista Roka, Rabin Sharma Pokharel, Arjya Tara Bajracharya, Surendra K. Mahadup, Nishan Katuwal, Kate Doyle, Jessica C. Seidman, Alice Carter, Stephen P. Luby, Isaac I. Bogoch, Kristen Aiemjoy, Denise O. Garrett, Rajeev Shrestha, Jason R. Andrews

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
Canadian institutionsToronto General Hospital
FundersBill and Melinda Gates Foundation
KeywordsTyphoid feverPandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)VirologyTyphoid vaccine2019-20 coronavirus outbreakMedicineSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Enteric feverConjugate vaccineGeographyImmunologyImmunizationOutbreakAntigenInfectious disease (medical specialty)Internal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Background While typhoid conjugate vaccines (TCV) offer promise for reducing risk in endemic settings, their population-level impact remains unclear. In 2022, Nepal introduced TCV nationally on the heels of the COVID-19 pandemic, which disrupted healthcare services, surveillance, and potentially typhoid transmission dynamics, complicating vaccine impact evaluation. We investigated the impact of TCV introduction amid shifting typhoid burden during the pandemic. Methods We analyzed blood culture data from four Kathmandu Valley health facilities, comparing culture positivity for Salmonella Typhi across three periods: pre-pandemic (January 2018-March 2020); pandemic, pre-vaccine introduction (April 2020-April 2022); post-vaccine introduction (May 2022-April 2024). We used multivariable logistic regression to assess S . Typhi positivity, adjusting for month and site, stratified by TCV-eligible children and older, TCV-ineligible populations. Results Between January 2018 and April 2024, 62,236 blood cultures were performed. S . Typhi blood culture positivity decreased from 2.11% pre-pandemic to 0.59% during the pandemic (p < 0.001) and remained low at 0.69% after TCV introduction. Among TCV-eligible children (15 months to 15 years), odds of S . Typhi positivity during the pandemic were 47% lower than the pre-COVID period (aOR 0.53, 95% CI 0.29-0.90) and continued to decrease by 76% post-TCV introduction (aOR 0.24, 95% CI 0.10-0.55). In contrast, among vaccine-ineligible individuals (≥16 years), odds of positivity during the pandemic were 78% lower than the pre-COVID period (aOR 0.22, 95% CI 0.16-0.30) but increased by 59% following TCV rollout (aOR 1.59, 95% CI 1.13-2.27). Sensitivity analyses restricted to pathogen-positive cultures yielded similar results. Conclusion S . Typhi blood culture positivity declined sharply during the pandemic before TCV introduction. The subsequent rollout of TCV substantially reduced typhoid burden in vaccine-eligible children; however, rising cases among older, vaccine-ineligible populations following the relaxation of pandemic measures highlights the need for additional control measures such as improved water and sanitation infrastructure and broader age eligibility for typhoid vaccination. AUTHOR SUMMARY Typhoid fever is a serious illness caused by bacteria that spread through contaminated food and water. In 2022, Nepal introduced a new typhoid vaccine for children, just as the country was recovering from the COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic transformed how people accessed healthcare and may have also affected how typhoid spread. We wanted to understand how both the pandemic and the vaccine rollout influenced typhoid infections over time. Using results from four hospitals in the Kathmandu Valley between 2018 and 2024, we compared the number of typhoid cases before the pandemic, during the pandemic before typhoid vaccine introduction, and after typhoid vaccine introduction. We found that typhoid cases dropped sharply during the pandemic, even before the typhoid vaccine introduced. After the vaccine was introduced, typhoid continued to decline in children who were eligible for the vaccine. However, cases increased in people who were not vaccinated. Our findings show that the vaccine helped protect the age group that received it, but highlights the need for additional interventions such as improvements to sanitation and clean water infrastructure, and expanding vaccine access to more age groups to control typhoid in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicViral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology→French-language works237,207→