MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411413070 · doi:10.3389/fvets.2025.1623761

Emergence delirium in small animals: a first step towards an objective assessment

2025· article· en· W4411413070 on OpenAlexaff
Luisa Mattei, Ludovica Chiavaccini, Claudia Spadavecchia, Alessandro Mirra

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Veterinary Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicVeterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersUniversity of Bern
KeywordsDeliriumBiologyPsychologyMedicineIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Emergence Delirium (ED) is a condition characterized by agitation, confusion and disorientation that can occur in human patients during recovery from anesthesia. In veterinary medicine, a similar phenomenon is observed, but the frequency of occurrence and the characteristics of symptoms are not yet well defined. This study aimed to identify ED symptoms in dogs and cats, explore their occurrence, and recognize related factors. Materials and methods: In this prospective observational study anesthesia providers systematically, recorded symptoms observed in patients during the recovery phase following anesthesia. The study was divided into three phases. Phase 1: a group of six veterinary anesthesiologists created a list of symptoms possibly related to ED in small animals.Phase 2: demographic and anesthesia-related data were collected for dogs and cats undergoing general anesthesia at the veterinary teaching hospital of the University of Bern between May 2022 and January 2023. The occurrence of ED symptoms was analyzed and based on the occurrence of the listed ED symptoms, animals were assigned to 2 groups: NED group (No-ED group; less than four symptoms observed); ED group (four or more symptoms observed). Phase 3: a logistic regression analysis was performed to explore potential associations between ED occurrence and subject or anesthesia related factors. Results: Phase 1: based on expert agreement, six symptoms were selected: nystagmus, paddling, opisthotonos, uncoordinated/violent movement, vocalization, and biting. Phase 2: data were recorded from 184 animals (139 dogs, 45 cats). The most common ED symptoms occurring were uncoordinated movement (41%), vocalization (36%) and paddling (30%). More than half of the study population (104/184, 57%) showed at least one symptom of ED; 14% (26/184) of the animals were included in the ED group. Phase 3: no association between subject or anesthesia related factors and the occurrence of ED was found in the univariable analysis. Conclusion: Based on the proposed list of symptoms, post anesthetic ED seems to occur frequently in small animals. The observations conducted in the present study can help further evaluation of this phenomenon in dogs and cats.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Veterinary ScienceSame topicVeterinary Pharmacology and AnesthesiaFrench-language works237,207