MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411418099 · doi:10.1186/s42523-025-00404-0

Host traits and environmental variation shape gut microbiota diversity in wild threespine stickleback

2025· article· en· W4411418099 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnimal Microbiome · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGut microbiota and health
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of California, San DiegoDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsBiologySticklebackGut floraHost (biology)EcologyEvolutionary ecologyNicheEvolutionary biologyTrophic levelEnvironmental changeBeta diversityZoologyBiodiversityClimate changeFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Despite the growing recognition of the importance of gut microbiota in host ecology and evolution, our understanding of the relative contributions of host-associated and environmental factors shaping gut microbiota composition within and across wild populations remains limited. Here, we investigate how host morphology, sex, genetic divergence, and environmental characteristics influence the gut microbiota of threespine stickleback fish populations from 20 lakes on Vancouver Island, Canada. RESULTS: Our findings reveal substantial variation in gut microbiota composition and diversity among populations, with host traits exerting a relatively stronger influence on bacterial alpha diversity than environmental characteristics. Previous studies have suggested a link between stickleback body shape and niche specialization, and our results indicate that aspects of host morphology may be associated with gut microbiota divergence among populations, though whether this is related to trophic ecology remains to be explored. Within and across populations, we only observed a weakly defined core microbiota and limited sharing of amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) among hosts, indicating that gut microbiota composition is individualized. Additionally, we detected sex-dependent differences in microbial diversity, opening avenues for future research into the mechanisms driving this variation. CONCLUSIONS: In sum, our study emphasizes the need to consider both host-associated and environmental factors in shaping gut microbiota dynamics and highlights the complex interplay between host organisms, their associated microbial communities, and the environment in natural settings. Ultimately, these insights add to our understanding of the eco-evolutionary implications of host-microbiota interactions while underscoring the need for further investigation into the underlying mechanisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.944
Threshold uncertainty score0.853

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it