MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411423563 · doi:10.1021/acsestwater.5c00250

Tackling Voids in Observations: An Approach to Reconstruct Rainfall <sup>35</sup>S Time Series from Proxy Parameters

2025· article· en· W4411423563 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Michael Schubert, Felipe Saavedra Melendez, Mang Lin, Stefan Terzer‐Wassmuth, Lasse Hertle, Ina Tegen, Kay Knöeller, Axel Schmidt

Bibliographic record

VenueACS ES&T Water · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBundesamt für StrahlenschutzNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchNational Science Foundation
KeywordsProxy (statistics)Series (stratigraphy)Environmental scienceStatistical physicsGeologyMathematicsMeteorologyClimatologyStatisticsPhysicsPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Due to its short half-life (87.4 days) and omnipresence, cosmogenic radio-sulfur ( 35 S) is an attractive tracer for investigating subyearly groundwater residence times. 35 S is transported to the lower atmosphere by large-scale air mass circulation and transferred to groundwater by precipitation. For groundwater dating, the variability of 35 S concentration in precipitation requires a 35 S input function. However, the required 35 S data are often not available. To fill this gap, we present an approach to reconstructing 35 S concentrations in precipitation based on proxy parameters of better availability. The tested parameters include natural 7 Be and 3 H, parameters that allow quantifying cosmogenic 35 S production, and parameters that are correlated to the intensity of 35 S washout from the atmosphere. In comparison with an unrivaled 4 year time series of 35 S in precipitation, we discuss the correlations of all parameters with 35 S, assess their individual applicability as 35 S proxies, and evaluate the predictive power of joint data sets in varying combination. As a result, we present a modeling approach that allows reconstruction of a 35 S input function with a monthly temporal resolution based on proxy parameters. This novel modeling approach provides a valuable tool for groundwater dating using 35 S as a tracer in studies that lack directly measured 35 S input data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS ES&T WaterSame topicClimate variability and modelsFrench-language works237,207