MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411427975 · doi:10.1080/23249935.2025.2517306

Traffic state estimation and prediction based on Bayesian approach in urban road networks using AVI and floating vehicle data

2025· article· en· W4411427975 on OpenAlexaff
Jianhua Song, Bruce Hellinga, Gang Ren, Jian Yuan, Qi Cao, Jingfeng Ma, Yue Deng

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportmetrica A Transport Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsEstimationComputer scienceState (computer science)Bayesian probabilityBayesian networkData miningTransport engineeringArtificial intelligenceEngineeringAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate estimation and prediction of traffic state is crucial for the development of intelligent transportation systems. However, existing studies focus on traffic state at the links or intersections, and under-saturated scenarios, limiting their applicability at the network. This study proposes a framework for network-scale traffic state estimation and prediction by integrating trajectory and AVI data. The framework includes queue length estimation for different links equipped with AVI systems and state estimation and prediction for unobserved links. Validation uses large-scale real-world and simulation datasets. Results show that, with real-world data, the MAE for queue length and travel time estimation are less than 0.69 vehicles and 1.35 s, respectively, with prediction MAE around 1 vehicle. In simulations, the proposed method outperforms benchmarks under various demands, achieving queue length MAE of 2.43 vehicles under high demand. These findings indicate high accuracy in both estimation and prediction, suitable for under-saturated and over-saturated conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportmetrica A Transport ScienceSame topicTraffic Prediction and Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207