Quantitative insights into stroke recovery utilizing delayed vessel ratio from color-coded multiphase computed tomography angiography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background and objective: The color-coded multiphase computed tomography angiography (cmCTA) is an accredited technique that employs color-coding to visually depict the temporal dynamics of collateral blood flow in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). This research aimed to assess the quantification of cmCTA in AIS patients for characterizing arterial and venous collateral flow, and predicting functional outcomes. Methods: A retrospective study was performed on a consecutive cohort of AIS patients with large vessel occlusion who underwent cmCTA scan and reconstruction. Collateral ratio and delayed vessel ratio (DVR) were determined through semi-automatic delineation and calculation on the anterior cerebral artery regions and Alberta Stroke Program Early CT (ASPECT) Score regions of cmCTA maps. Deep venous outflow (DVO) and superficial venous outflow (SVO) scores were assessed using a 6-point scale. Logistic regression and propensity score were applied to confounding factors adjustment and model construction. Receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis were utilized to evaluate the prediction model of functional independence and excellent recovery. Results: < 0.001). Adjusted DVR showed areas under the curve of 0.81-0.90 for predicting functional independence and excellent recovery. Adjusted DVO showed areas under the curve of 0.88 for predicting functional independence and excellent recovery. Each prediction model demonstrated good precision and net benefit. Conclusion: The application of DVR and other parameters in cmCTA offers a quantitative perspective on the conventional ASPECT scoring scheme utilizing grayscale CT images. DVR from cmCTA may enhance pre-treatment collateral assessment and post-treatment outcome prediction in AIS, facilitating informed treatment decisions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".