Evaluating the Impact of Flour Protein Content on the Quality of Wholegrain Refrigerated Dough
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Background and Objectives Refrigerated dough products offer convenience, but are often produced using refined flour. However, wholewheat flour‐based products provide health benefits by increasing dietary fiber intake. This study aims to determine the optimal flour protein content for developing clean label refrigerated dough using wholegrain Canada Western Red Spring (CWRS) wheat. Three CWRS wheat samples with varying protein contents: Sample 1–Average Protein (S1‐AP) (13.30%), Sample 2—Intermediate High Protein (S2‐IHP) (14.91%), and Sample 3—High Protein (S3‐HP) (16.48%), were analyzed. The proximate composition of wholegrain flour samples was determined using standard methods. Dough mixing and starch pasting properties were evaluated using micro‐dough LAB and RVA, respectively. Dough samples were prepared and stored at 4°C for 35 days, with subsets baked and assessed for end‐use quality every 7 days. Xylanase activity and dough syruping were monitored throughout storage. Findings S3‐HP exhibited reduced starch pasting properties, shorter dough development time, and lower stability. S2‐IHP demonstrated better mixing stability and lower mixing tolerance index, indicating superior dough handling properties. Xylanase activity was highest in S1‐AP at 35 days and lowest in S2‐IHP. Dough syruping increased significantly during the first 14 days and stabilized thereafter. Bread quality declined with storage, with volume decreasing and firmness increasing, especially in S1‐AP. Lightness ( L *) decreased over time in all samples. Conclusions S2‐IHP, which showed intermediate/moderately high protein content, was identified as the most suitable for wholegrain refrigerated dough, as it maintained superior end‐use quality characteristics compared to the other samples. Significance and Novelty This study provides insights into the impact of flour protein content on the functionality and storage stability of wholegrain refrigerated dough, aiding in the development of clean label products with improved quality and processing characteristics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".