MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411441801 · doi:10.1016/j.jaacop.2025.06.004

Lifetime Potentially Traumatic Events and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Outcomes in Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

2025· article· en· W4411441801 on OpenAlexafffund
Laura Belschner, Robert J. McMahon, S. Evelyn Stewart

Bibliographic record

VenueJAACAP Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Canadian institutionsBC Mental Health & Substance Use ServicesUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Children's HospitalSimon Fraser University
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for InnovationBC Children's HospitalMichael Smith Health Research BCBombardier
KeywordsObsessive compulsiveCognitive behavioral therapyCognitionClinical psychologyPsychologyCognitive processing therapyPsychotherapistCognitive therapyMedicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective This study evaluated impacts of traumatic stress, a social determinant of health, on cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) outcomes in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Closing this literature gap is crucial for optimizing individual treatment approaches in pediatric OCD and limiting misinterpretation of OCD symptoms in the context of a trauma history. Method Ninety-eight OCD-affected youth (8-19 years) completed an evidence-based CBT group program. Lifetime potentially traumatic events (PTE) were assessed at baseline by type and cumulative load with the Traumatic Events Screening Inventory - Parent Report Revised. Longitudinal treatment outcome measures assessed OCD-related symptom severity, functional and family impairment, and family accommodation at baseline, mid-and end-of-treatment, and 1-month follow-up. Specifically, functional impairment was assessed via the Child OCD Impact Scale-Revised. Results Lifetime PTE load was not associated with any CBT outcomes ( p s > .218). In exploratory analyses, associations of specific trauma types with timing and directionality of functional impairment changes were as follows: physical abuse was associated with differences in early treatment response ( β = 12.2, 95% CI [2.0, 22.4], p = .020); emotional abuse was associated with differences in maintenance of gains at 1-month follow-up ( β = 10.0, 95% CI [1.6, 18.4], p = .021); and the death of someone close was associated with differences in outcomes at mid- ( β = –9.1, 95% CI [-15.3, -3.1], p = .006) and endpoint ( β = –6.9, 95% CI [-13.4, -0.4], p = .040). Emotional abuse was also associated with reduced maintenance of family functioning improvement at 1-month follow-up ( β = 7.8, 95% CI [0.5, 15.1], p = .040). Conclusion Preliminary results suggest that cumulative trauma exposure did not significantly impact CBT outcomes in pediatric OCD. Exploratory analyses suggest that specific trauma types may be associated with different patterns of functional improvement during treatment phases, highlighting potential areas for future research in the pediatric OCD literature .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAACAP OpenSame topicObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersFrench-language works237,207